New York Fraud Defense
New York Criminal Impersonation Lawyer
Lebedin Kofman LLP defends clients accused of criminal impersonation in New York, including cases involving financial records, identity information, checks, applications, accounts, communications, and alleged intent to defraud.
Call 646-663-4430 Contact the Firm
Defense for criminal impersonation
The New York Courts Penal Law jury-instruction table lists Article 190 Other Frauds as its own offense group. These cases need focused defense work because alleged intent, identity, authorization, records, account access, and loss calculations can drive the outcome.
Fraud investigations often begin before an arrest. Early counsel can help protect the client before statements are made, records are produced without strategy, or investigators lock into an incomplete theory.
What Prosecutors May Focus On
- Intent to defraud, identity, authorization, knowledge, value, loss, or benefit obtained.
- Financial records, account records, checks, applications, identity documents, phone or device data, and witness statements.
- Whether the allegation is criminal fraud rather than a mistake, civil dispute, employment dispute, or billing issue.
Defense Issues to Review Early
- Record accuracy, account access, authorization, intent, identity, and loss calculation.
- Digital evidence, bank records, agency records, subpoenas, searches, statements, and communications.
- Collateral consequences involving employment, licensing, immigration, reputation, restitution, and pending cases.
Related Defense Pages
- Fraud Defense
- Identity Theft Defense
- Theft Crimes
- Grand Larceny Defense
- Forgery Defense
- False Written Statements
- Credit Card Fraud
- Criminal Defense
Contact a New York Fraud Defense Attorney
If you are accused of criminal impersonation, speak with counsel before discussing records, accounts, checks, identity information, or transactions with investigators.
Call 646-663-4430 Send a Confidential Inquiry
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every case is different and must be evaluated on its own facts, evidence, procedural posture, and applicable law.