Skip to main content
Available 24/7 for urgent criminal matters.New York City & Long Island   646 663 4430
646 663 4430 Call
  1. Home
  2. Practice Areas
  3. Manhattan Grand Larceny Defense Lawyers

DEFENSE FOR YOUR NEXT STEP

Manhattan Grand Larceny Defense Lawyers

A grand larceny investigation can involve account records, alleged shoplifting or a disputed business transaction. Before explaining the facts to investigators, preserve the records and identify the exact charge and next deadline. Lebedin Kofman LLP can assess the intent, ownership, valuation and evidence issues in your Manhattan case.

Keep the request, preserve the records and identify the next deadline.

If investigators have asked about money, merchandise or an account transaction, consult counsel before giving an explanation. Save the request, court papers and complete records. Do not delete messages, alter a ledger or contact a complainant to negotiate privately. An attorney can assess the allegation and advise how to respond.

For a Manhattan matter, bring the exact court location, return date and charging document. Tell counsel whether you were arrested, received a desk appearance ticket, were asked to surrender or have only been contacted about an investigation. Those situations call for different immediate preparation.

What must the prosecution prove?

Under Penal Law § 155.05, larceny involves wrongfully taking, obtaining or withholding another owner's property with the required intent to deprive or appropriate. Taking an item away is not the only possible theory: the statute also addresses conduct such as embezzlement, false pretenses, qualifying false promises, extortion, wage theft and deed theft.

The statutory definitions of ownership and intent matter. A right to possession superior to the accused person's right can establish ownership; legal title alone does not decide every case. Deprivation is not limited to keeping property forever. A sufficiently extended withholding, loss of its major economic benefit or disposal making recovery unlikely can qualify. Counsel should examine the actual transaction and the person's understanding when it occurred.

Degrees of grand larceny

The following are common value-based routes. Each threshold means more than the stated amount. Other statutory routes can apply regardless of value, so a small alleged loss does not automatically make a charge a misdemeanor.

  • Fourth degree, § 155.30: property worth more than $1,000; a class E felony.
  • Third degree, § 155.35: property worth more than $3,000; a class D felony.
  • Second degree, § 155.40: property worth more than $50,000; a class C felony.
  • First degree, § 155.42: property worth more than $1 million; a class B felony.

Fourth-degree routes include certain credit or debit cards, property taken from a person, firearms and specified extortion. For the vehicle provision, the statute requires a motor vehicle other than a motorcycle and value exceeding $100. A motor vehicle is not, by itself, the special third-degree category; § 155.35 separately addresses an automated teller machine or its contents.

The statutes also address aggregation of retail merchandise under a qualifying common scheme or ongoing intent, including goods from different owners. Deed-theft provisions create additional routes to third, second or first degree based on the property and circumstances. The complaint's precise subdivision and applicable law must be reviewed rather than relying on a dollar chart alone.

How larceny differs from burglary and robbery

Petit larceny under § 155.25 is a class A misdemeanor. Where a grand-larceny route applies, value is only one part of the analysis. Third-degree burglary under § 140.20 concerns knowingly entering or remaining unlawfully in a building with intent to commit a crime there; an actual completed theft is not its only issue. Robbery requires the statutory connection between larceny and force or threatened immediate force. Different charges require different defenses.

Valuation and disputed loss

Section 155.20 generally uses market value at the time and place of the alleged crime, or replacement cost within a reasonable time when market value cannot be satisfactorily determined. Written instruments and other specified property have special rules. A receipt, an account balance or a complainant's estimate should be tested against the applicable valuation rule.

Preserve invoices, comparable prices, item condition, returned goods, credits and records identifying the alleged transactions. If the prosecution combines incidents, counsel should examine both the amounts and the legal basis for combining them. Distinguish the amount claimed for charging purposes from any proposed restitution calculation.

Potential penalties and consequences

Under the general indeterminate-sentence framework in § 70.00, maximum terms for class E, D, C and B felonies are four, seven, fifteen and twenty-five years respectively. These ceilings are not a prediction of the sentence. Prior convictions, the specific offense and applicable sentencing provisions affect the analysis; some cases permit alternatives.

A disposition can also involve financial obligations and affect immigration status, employment, professional licensing and reputation. Bring prior dispositions and explain any license, immigration or workplace concern before considering a plea. Counsel should address eligibility for alternatives and supported mitigation, including personal history, treatment needs, community responsibilities and any restitution proposal.

Defense and suppression issues

Important questions include identification, authority to use the property, the alleged intent, the reliability of financial records and whether the charged degree is supported. A business disagreement or an unperformed promise does not alone answer the criminal-intent question. For a false-promise theory, § 155.05 imposes particular proof requirements; nonperformance alone is insufficient.

Section 155.15 provides a good-faith claim-of-right affirmative defense for trespassory taking or embezzlement. It is not a universal defense to every larceny theory. Give counsel the agreement, permission, communications and circumstances supporting your understanding. Any coercion or threat also needs an individual legal assessment.

The defense may need to challenge a search, seizure, statement or identification procedure. Organized retail, identity-related and high-value allegations require careful review of who did what and what records connect each person to the conduct. Describe any force or weapon allegation separately; those facts may raise additional charges.

Evidence to bring to the consultation

  • The complaint, subpoena, interview request, court notices and any orders.
  • Contracts, invoices, receipts, payroll records and complete account statements.
  • Original emails and messages showing authorization, intent or a disputed transaction.
  • Surveillance locations, witness details and dates when recordings may be overwritten.
  • Prior dispositions and documents relevant to immigration or professional licensing.

Preparing for court and decisions about resolution

Early preparation should address the next appearance, release conditions, records to preserve and the prosecution's theory. The route to a felony disposition, any grand jury issue and motion deadlines depend on the case's posture. Discuss those decisions with counsel using the actual papers.

Negotiations, restitution, motions and trial preparation serve different purposes. Paying money or obtaining a complainant's agreement does not automatically end a prosecution. Counsel can evaluate the strength of the proof, possible resolutions and collateral consequences before you make a commitment.

THE FIRM’S CASE RECORD

Relevant reported results.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every matter depends on its own facts and law.

Employment check theft and forgery

The client faced third-degree grand larceny and second-degree forged-instrument charges involving checks from an employer. The firm reports dismissal of all criminal charges.

Read the case result →

Grand larceny and forgery allegations

The firm reports a disposition with no criminal record and no jail time in this grand larceny and forgery matter.

Read the case result →

Common questions about grand larceny

Can property worth less than $1,000 support a felony charge?

Yes. Certain statutory routes depend on the property or how it was obtained rather than a general dollar threshold. Counsel should check the charged subdivision and evidence before treating the allegation as petit larceny.

Does repaying the alleged loss automatically dismiss the case?

No. Discuss restitution with counsel before contacting a complainant or making a payment. The effect depends on the evidence, the charge and any negotiated disposition; repayment is not a guaranteed dismissal.

What if I believed I had permission to use the property?

Preserve the agreement and messages showing that understanding. Authorization, ownership and intent may be central issues, but their significance depends on the alleged conduct. The statutory claim-of-right defense is limited to specified larceny theories.

Legal references reviewed September 30, 2026: Penal Law §§ 155.00, 155.05, 155.15, 155.20, 155.30, 155.35, 155.40, 155.42 and 70.00.

YOUR NEXT STEP

Talk to a New York defense attorney.

Tell us the immediate issue and the best way to reach you. For an arrest, police contact, or an approaching court date, call the firm directly.

646 663 4430

Free consultation. Do not wait for a form response when a deadline is near.

Submitting this form does not create an attorney client relationship. Do not send highly sensitive documents or detailed confidential information through this form.

Call 646 663 4430Free Consultation