Fraud Crimes Defense
New York Penal Law 190.60 and 190.65 Scheme to Defraud Lawyer
Lebedin Kofman LLP defends clients facing New York Penal Law 190.60 and 190.65 allegations in New York state courts and related federal, forfeiture, licensing, immigration, and reputational matters. These cases often depend on what the government can actually prove about intent, knowledge, possession, value, identity, records, and the charged statutory degree.
What Prosecutors Must Prove
Using the New York statutory framework and the Criminal Jury Instructions approach, prosecutors must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt. For this offense, the core proof issues include:
- a systematic ongoing course of conduct;
- intent to defraud more than one person or obtain property from more than one person by false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises;
- property actually obtained from at least one person;
- for first degree, proof of one of the statutory aggravators, including ten or more intended victims, property value over $1,000, vulnerable elderly victim provisions, or certain solid-waste conduct.
The government still has to prove the case with admissible evidence. Suspicion, business disputes, account records, possession of property, or association with another person are not enough unless the required mental state and statutory elements are proven.
How This Charge Can Come Up
A scheme-to-defraud case can arise from an alleged repeated pattern of false promises, online transactions, business dealings, services, rentals, investments, or billing activity where prosecutors claim multiple people were targeted.
These cases often start before an arrest through subpoenas, audit letters, detective calls, insurer or bank inquiries, search warrants, electronic account records, surveillance, or interviews. Early defense work can protect statements, preserve helpful evidence, and keep the case from being framed only through the prosecution’s version of events.
Defense Issues
- No systematic ongoing course of conduct.
- A contract or business dispute is being treated as a crime.
- No intent to defraud at the time of the statements.
- The alleged victims or property value do not satisfy the charged degree.
- The prosecution is relying on broad summaries instead of witness-specific proof.
Depending on the facts, the defense may also involve suppression motions, subpoena challenges, forensic accounting, digital-forensics review, valuation analysis, witness investigation, restitution strategy, and negotiations designed to reduce criminal, licensing, employment, and immigration exposure.
Sentencing and Collateral Consequences
Scheme to Defraud Lawyer carries Class A misdemeanor or Class E felony depending on degree exposure. The real-world consequences can also include restitution, forfeiture, orders of protection, professional discipline, employment consequences, immigration issues, business disruption, and reputational damage.
Why Contact Lebedin Kofman LLP
Russ Kofman and Lebedin Kofman LLP handle serious criminal matters, fraud investigations, federal cases, asset issues, Title IX matters, DWI cases, and sensitive allegations where careers and reputations are at stake. The firm works to identify proof problems early and position cases for dismissal, reduction, trial, or strategic resolution.
Before choosing a defense lawyer, review the firm’s client feedback, representative matters, and Russ Kofman’s profile.
Why People Call Lebedin Kofman LLP
When a criminal allegation, DWI arrest, federal investigation, Title IX matter, or high-stakes accusation can affect your freedom, license, job, education, immigration status, or reputation, you should be able to speak with a defense lawyer quickly and get a clear plan.
- Speak with a lawyer about an arrest, investigation, court date, order of protection, license consequence, or federal exposure.
- Get early guidance before speaking with police, prosecutors, school investigators, insurers, agencies, or employers.
- Review defense options including dismissal, reduction, suppression issues, trial posture, negotiation strategy, and collateral consequences.
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I speak to detectives, insurers, banks, or investigators?
Speak with defense counsel first. Statements made early can affect the entire case.
Can these cases become federal?
Yes. Fraud, stolen-property, identity, bank, wire, mail, health-care, and document allegations can overlap with federal investigations.
Can the case be reduced or dismissed?
That depends on the evidence, but defenses often focus on intent, knowledge, value, identification, admissibility, and whether the charged degree is overreaching.
Contact
If you are under investigation or charged, early defense strategy can change the direction of the case.
Source basis: NY Senate Penal Law 190.60 and 190.65; NY Courts CJI Article 190 framework. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances.