Available 24/7. FREE attorney consultation via phone, video conferencing, or in person

Call Us: 646-663-4430

Identity Theft Defense

New York Penal Law 190.78 Identity Theft in the Third Degree Lawyer

Lebedin Kofman LLP defends clients facing New York Penal Law 190.78 allegations in New York state courts and related federal, forfeiture, licensing, immigration, and reputational matters. These cases often depend on what the government can actually prove about intent, knowledge, possession, value, identity, records, and the charged statutory degree.

StatuteNew York Penal Law 190.78
Search PhrasePL 190.78 identity theft third degree
ExposureClass A misdemeanor
Main Defense FocusIntent, knowledge, value, records, and proof of the charged degree.

What Prosecutors Must Prove

Using the New York statutory framework and the Criminal Jury Instructions approach, prosecutors must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt. For this offense, the core proof issues include:

  1. knowingly and with intent to defraud;
  2. assuming another person’s identity by presenting as that person, acting as that person, or using that person’s personal identifying information;
  3. obtaining goods, money, property, services, or credit, causing financial loss, or committing a class A misdemeanor or higher offense.

The government still has to prove the case with admissible evidence. Suspicion, business disputes, account records, possession of property, or association with another person are not enough unless the required mental state and statutory elements are proven.

How This Charge Can Come Up

A third-degree identity-theft allegation may involve alleged use of another person’s identifying information for a purchase, account, benefit, service, credit transaction, or related misdemeanor-level conduct.

These cases often start before an arrest through subpoenas, audit letters, detective calls, insurer or bank inquiries, search warrants, electronic account records, surveillance, or interviews. Early defense work can protect statements, preserve helpful evidence, and keep the case from being framed only through the prosecution’s version of events.

Defense Issues

  • No intent to defraud.
  • Permission or authority to use the information.
  • Mistaken identity or shared-device issues.
  • No proof of financial loss, benefit, or qualifying offense.
  • Weak digital, account, or surveillance evidence.

Depending on the facts, the defense may also involve suppression motions, subpoena challenges, forensic accounting, digital-forensics review, valuation analysis, witness investigation, restitution strategy, and negotiations designed to reduce criminal, licensing, employment, and immigration exposure.

Sentencing and Collateral Consequences

Identity Theft in the Third Degree Lawyer carries Class A misdemeanor exposure. The real-world consequences can also include restitution, forfeiture, orders of protection, professional discipline, employment consequences, immigration issues, business disruption, and reputational damage.

Why Contact Lebedin Kofman LLP

Russ Kofman and Lebedin Kofman LLP handle serious criminal matters, fraud investigations, federal cases, asset issues, Title IX matters, DWI cases, and sensitive allegations where careers and reputations are at stake. The firm works to identify proof problems early and position cases for dismissal, reduction, trial, or strategic resolution.

Reviews and real case experience matter.

Before choosing a defense lawyer, review the firm’s client feedback, representative matters, and Russ Kofman’s profile.

Why People Call Lebedin Kofman LLP

When a criminal allegation, DWI arrest, federal investigation, Title IX matter, or high-stakes accusation can affect your freedom, license, job, education, immigration status, or reputation, you should be able to speak with a defense lawyer quickly and get a clear plan.

Thousands of clients helpedDeep experience handling serious criminal, DWI, federal, Title IX, and related matters across New York.
Hundreds of client reviewsPublic client feedback helps visitors see that real people have trusted the firm in difficult moments.
Free consultationCall 646-663-4430 to discuss what happened, what comes next, and what can be done immediately.
Fast attorney contactFor urgent matters, the firm aims to connect callers with an attorney within about four minutes whenever possible.
  • Speak with a lawyer about an arrest, investigation, court date, order of protection, license consequence, or federal exposure.
  • Get early guidance before speaking with police, prosecutors, school investigators, insurers, agencies, or employers.
  • Review defense options including dismissal, reduction, suppression issues, trial posture, negotiation strategy, and collateral consequences.

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I speak to detectives, insurers, banks, or investigators?

Speak with defense counsel first. Statements made early can affect the entire case.

Can these cases become federal?

Yes. Fraud, stolen-property, identity, bank, wire, mail, health-care, and document allegations can overlap with federal investigations.

Can the case be reduced or dismissed?

That depends on the evidence, but defenses often focus on intent, knowledge, value, identification, admissibility, and whether the charged degree is overreaching.

Contact

If you are under investigation or charged, early defense strategy can change the direction of the case.

Source basis: NY Senate Penal Law 190.78; NY Courts CJI Article 190 framework. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every case is unique and must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances.

Statute focus NY Penal Law 190.78 White-collar defense hub Free consultation
Official jury-instruction framework

Identity Theft in the Third Degree: What Prosecutors Must Prove

NY Penal Law 190.78 - source framework: New York Criminal Jury Instructions for Identity Theft in the Third Degree.

  • The prosecution generally must prove knowing assumption of another person's identity by presenting as that person, acting as that person, or using that person's personal identifying information.
  • The People must prove intent to defraud and the charged result, such as obtaining goods, money, property, services, credit use, financial loss, or commission of a qualifying crime.
  • Defense review should examine whether the person actually existed, whether identifying information was knowingly used, consent or permission, mistake, shared accounts, lack of fraudulent objective, weak digital attribution, police recovery issues, statements, and opportunities for dismissal, reduction, restitution-focused resolution, or sealing-aware strategy.

Third-degree identity theft can still carry major practical consequences for employment, licensing, immigration, restitution, background checks, and future felony exposure.

Why call Lebedin Kofman LLP?

Identity-theft cases often involve financial records, devices, account access, alleged victims, restitution, licensing issues, immigration concerns, and reputation damage. The firm handles serious fraud and criminal-defense matters and offers a free attorney consultation. Call 646-663-4430 so an attorney can discuss the fastest way to protect your record and limit exposure.

Hundreds of 5 Star Reviews

Clients turn to Lebedin Kofman LLP when the stakes are high.

Read what clients have said about the firm's responsiveness, preparation, and defense work in criminal, DWI, federal, Title IX, and related high-stakes matters.